Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία

αναλυτική αναζήτηση

 ΙΔΡΥΜΑ ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ
z
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Αναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΑΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΒΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΓΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΔΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΕΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΖΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΗΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΘΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΙΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΚΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΛΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΜΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΝΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΞΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΟΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΠΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΡΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΣΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΤΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΥΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΦΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΧΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΨΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα Ω

Paul of Samosata

Συγγραφή : Kamara Afroditi (3/9/2001)
Μετάφραση : Velentzas Georgios

Για παραπομπή: Kamara Afroditi, "Paul of Samosata",
Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία
URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=9150>
Παύλος Σαμοσάτων (27/3/2008 v.1) Paul of Samosata (15/2/2006 v.1) 
 

1. Biography

Paul was born in Samosata, but any other information about his family is rather uncertain. Some believe that his family was very poor, but the opposite view has also been suggested. In any case, he managed to amass a great personal fortune and ascend the episcopal throne of Antioch as Demetrianos’ successor.

2. Activity – Views

The most detailed account of Paul’s activities is provided by Eusebios.1 Paul is presented as a leader abusing his power. In 260 he was consecrated bishop of Antioch. Throughout his tenure he maintained a personal guard defending both him and the cathedral. Apart from this guard, Paul also employed secretaries for his correspondence and altered the interior of the cathedral with a large episcopal throne, a bema and the secretum, a small private room for his personal meetings. The portrait of Paul by the bishop and historian Eusebios reveals not only his Machiavellian character but also the interest of the early Church in attracting educated and influential members from upper social classes.

Paul’s innovations and attitude towards liturgical issues were provocative, but so were his theological views. He developed his own Christology maintaining that Christ was only of human nature and interpreting the term of “consubstantial” in his own way as regarded the relation between God and Christ within a definition of the Holy Trinity.

These views were fiercely opposed by one of his priests, Malchion, the then head of the theological school of Antioch. Two councils were convened in Antioch to deal especially with this issue under Dionysios of Alexandria and Phirmilianus of Caesarea. The first, in 264, was fruitless, but the second, held in 268, obliged Paul to officially formulate his doctrine before it deposed him and appointed Domnus as his successor. Paul’s denial to abandon the episcopal residence prompted his rivals to send a letter to Emperor Aurelian (270-275) asking for his intervention.

At this point a rather political issue emerged, but its details are quite uncertain. Apart from his clerical capacity, Paul also held a political dignity, that of procurator ducenarius.2 It seems that he used this post as an excuse, under the protection of his guard, to refuse to abandon the episcopal residence. This title had allegedly been awarded to him by Zenobia, queen of Palmyra, when she had extended her power to Antioch. However, Zenobia did not manage to capture Antioch before 269, a year after Paul’s deposition. It is most likely that his opponents resorted to writing to Aurelian because Paul was an official of the Roman state. He took advantage of the gap of power resulting from Valerian’s defeat by the Sāsānid Dynasty and the extension of the sphere of influence of Palmyra to the region of Antioch, before he was finally removed from the episcopal see in 272, when Aurelian recaptured the city.

3. Impact – Evaluation

Paul’s theological views and his interpretation of the term "consubstantial" are considered the forerunners of Nestorianism. Some theologians support that Paul’s views were the forerunners of Adoptionism, a heresy widely spread in the eastern provinces of Asia Minor and very popular with the Armenian Church. On the other hand, Paul represented the native “Syrian” element in the theological thought of Antioch opposing those who supported the Alexandrian views and the antecedence of the Greek language and culture, which was probably the reason for his alliance with Zenobia.3

1. Eus., Hist. Eccl. 7.28-30. Apart from Eusebios, the personality and theological views of Paul also preoccupied Theodoret of Cyrrhus, Haeret. Fab. Comp. 2.11 and Epiphanius, Panar. 65.

2. Procuratores/Pronoetes were administrative officials from the class of the equestrians, who served mainly in the provinces and were directly subjected to the emperor (his subordinates in his attempt to control the provinces pushing aside the aristocratic senators). Depending on their fees they were divided into sexagenarii (annual fees of 60,000 sesterces), centenqrii (annual fees of 100,000 sesterces) and ducenarii (annual fees of 200,000 sesterces). The financial standing and importance of Paul’s office is thus revealed. However, researchers are divided as to whether this office was granted by the Roman emperor or Paul was given the title during the short life of the state of Palmyra. See Norris, F.W., “Paul of Samosata: Procurator Ducenarius”, JThS n.s. 35 (1984), pp. 50-70.

3. See Millar, F., “Paul of Samosata, Zenobia and Aurelian: the Church, local culture and political allegiance in third-century Syria”, JRS 61 (1971), pp. 1-17.
     
 
 
 
 
 

Δελτίο λήμματος
 
press image to open photo library
 

>>>
 
 
 
 
 
 

copyright © 2008, ΙΔΡΥΜΑ ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ

Το έργο Μεγάλη Δικτυακή «Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Ελληνικού Πολιτισμού» - Μέρος Α΄ συγχρηματοδοτήθηκε σε ποσοστό 80% από το Ευρωπαϊκό Ταμείο Περιφερειακής Ανάπτυξης (ΕΤΠΑ) και κατά 20% από εθνικούς πόρους στο πλαίσιο του Επιχειρησιακού Προγράμματος "Κοινωνία της Πληροφορίας" του Γ΄ ΚΠΣ.

Το έργο ΕΓΚΥΚΛΟΠΑΙΔΕΙΑ ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ συγχρηματοδοτήθηκε σε ποσοστό 80% από το Ευρωπαϊκό Ταμείο Περιφερειακής Ανάπτυξης (ΕΤΠΑ) και κατά 20% από εθνικούς πόρους στο πλαίσιο του Επιχειρησιακού Προγράμματος "Κοινωνία της Πληροφορίας" του Γ΄ ΚΠΣ.